Subject: Re: [xsl] nodes or multiple runs? From: Paul Tremblay <phthenry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 13:06:26 -0500 |
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 09:42:44AM -0000, Andrew Welch wrote: > > On another point you were asking, recreating a transform chain in a > single stylesheet is very easy, much easier than writing the chain imho, > so you should have no problem there. > I'm not sure what you mean by "recreating a transform chain in a single stylesheet." Do you mean something like this: <xsl:template match = "/"> <xsl:variable name = "phase1"> <xsl:apply-templates select = "." mode = "phase1"/> </xsl:variable> <xsl:appy-templates select = "$phase1" mode = "phase2"/> </xsl:template> ? If I understand things correctly, I can use this method and still maintain the logic of my stylesheets, only having to use mode for evry template. Paul -- ************************ *Paul Tremblay * *phthenry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx* ************************ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] nodes or multiple runs?, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] nodes or multiple runs?, cknell |
Re: [xsl] Flagging for No records f, Andrew Chapman | Date | Re: [xsl] nodes or multiple runs?, Paul Tremblay |
Month |