Subject: RE: [xsl] alternative for modes From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 10:58:00 -0000 |
> As I mentioned above, 'generalTemplate' can be called on > several places in the template, because everytime I need the > same calculations, ... on the 'root'-tag. But each time (in > every other place), I actually need different manipulations > on the 'child'-tag. In effect, you want a higher-order function/template that accepts a function/template as a parameter and then calls that function/template. This is precisely what Dimitre's FXSL approach does. You can't supply a template as a parameter, but you can supply a node that acts as a surrogate for the template, so that when you apply-templates to that node, the template that's invoked depends on which node was supplied. Michael Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] alternative for modes, Peter Billen | Thread | RE: [xsl] alternative for modes, Peter Billen |
RE: [xsl] alternative for modes, Peter Billen | Date | RE: [xsl] alternative for modes, Peter Billen |
Month |