Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: attribute values as name value pair From: "James A. Robinson" <jimr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 22:25:38 -0800 |
That'll teach me to double check things before I post! My solution was just plain wrong (sorry, long day). > select="count(preceding-sibling::*/@*[not(name()='trade')])"/> Does using preceding-sibling mean that the introduction of other elements or attributes will require adjustment of the code? I'm finding it very hard to adjust to a no-side-effect language. Jim XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: attribute values as name , Sam Byland | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: attribute values as n, James A. Robinson |
Re: [xsl] Trax and how to pass para, Paul Tremblay | Date | [xsl] Re: RE: Re: Network diagram -, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |