| 
 
Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: attribute values as name value pair  From: "James A. Robinson" <jimr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 22:25:38 -0800  | 
That'll teach me to double check things before I post! My solution was just plain wrong (sorry, long day). > select="count(preceding-sibling::*/@*[not(name()='trade')])"/> Does using preceding-sibling mean that the introduction of other elements or attributes will require adjustment of the code? I'm finding it very hard to adjust to a no-side-effect language. Jim XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread | 
|---|
  | 
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> | 
|---|---|---|
| [xsl] Re: attribute values as name , Sam Byland | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: attribute values as n, James A. Robinson | 
| Re: [xsl] Trax and how to pass para, Paul Tremblay | Date | [xsl] Re: RE: Re: Network diagram -, Dimitre Novatchev | 
| Month |