Subject: Re: [xsl] Schema-aware processors - W3C schemas only? From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 29 Feb 2004 08:01:48 +0000 |
>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Kay <mhk@xxxxxxxxx> writes: Michael> What's more, the conformance rules are written in an Michael> "all-or-nothing" style. You either support all these Michael> schema-aware features (import-schema, validate, node Michael> annotations) or you support none of them. The XSL WG Michael> deliberately tried to avoid having products that Michael> cherry-picked the individual features they wanted to Michael> implement. You mean like Saxon 7.8 does? :-) I refer to the annotating of attributes as xs:IDREF, which is specifically disallowed by the standard for Basic XSLT processors, and seems to make it impossible for a Basic XSLT processor to be fully backwards compatible with XSLT 1.0. Which I find objectionable. -- Colin Paul Adams Preston Lancashire XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Schema-aware processors -, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Schema-aware processors -, Colin Paul Adams |
Re: [xsl] Schema-aware processors -, Colin Paul Adams | Date | Re: [xsl] Schema-aware processors -, Colin Paul Adams |
Month |