Subject: Re: [xsl] positional grouping xslt2 From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:11:03 GMT |
I now have my normal list of templates, even if they are all moded, rather than the (near single) long and complex choose for the xslt 2.0 solution. Not sure if this tells us anything or not. The xslt2 version would also have been better written as multiple templates, (eg so that lists that are children of first level section were picked up as well as lists that were children of second level.) I just didn't want to spend the time refactoring it. Your xslt1 version didn't actually group up your bullet points into a list element did it? Coincindentally I just commented in reply to Mike's answer that while many of the for-each-group forms are convenient they can be done in xslt1 once you know the tricks, but that one is harder (as you have to stop using the child axis and process things one at a time allong the following-sibling axis.) David -- http://www.dcarlisle.demon.co.uk/matthew ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] positional grouping xslt2, David . Pawson | Thread | [xsl] Embedding html within xml, John Reid |
RE: [xsl] xsl search engine, Ricaud Matthieu | Date | RE: [xsl] Dsiplayig xml in tables, Ricaud Matthieu |
Month |