Subject: Re: [xsl] Testing for a following sibling node type that occurs at a varied position From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:26:26 +0100 |
you want to know if there is no B node between the current node and the next A? That's the same as saying you want the next A-or-B node to be an A which is test="following-sibling::*[self::A or self::B][1][self::A]" as always with these things, using keys a la muenchian grouping would make it more efficient, but make it work first. David -- The LaTeX Companion http://www.awprofessional.com/bookstore/product.asp?isbn=0201362996 http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0201362996/202-7257897-0619804 ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Testing for a following s, Wright, Steve | Thread | RE: [xsl] Testing for a following s, Wright, Steve |
RE: [xsl] Testing for a following s, Wright, Steve | Date | RE: [xsl] Testing for a following s, Wright, Steve |
Month |