Re: [xsl] XSL equivalent of SQL having

[Francesco Barresi <kywocs@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi John,

Yes, just use the XPath expresion: 

//two[child::*]
or
//two[child::three]
or
/one/two[child::*]
or
/one/two[child::three]

Any of this should work to match those elements <two> that have children.

Bye
Francesco.


On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:49:46 -0400, john-xsl-list
<john-xsl-list@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I want to process all second level nodes that have children.  Is there an
> XPath to retrieve all nodes having children, or do I add logic to ignore
> nodes without children after the XPath has already been evaluated?
> 
> <one>
>   <two>
>     <three>
>   </two>
>   <two />
>   <two>
>     <three>
>   </two>
> </one>
> 
> Is there an XPath that will only return the first and third instances of
> <two>?
> 
> 



-- 
www.GetFirefox.com !!