Subject: Re: [xsl] XSL equivalent of SQL having From: Francesco Barresi <kywocs@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:00:28 -0400 |
Hi John, Yes, just use the XPath expresion: //two[child::*] or //two[child::three] or /one/two[child::*] or /one/two[child::three] Any of this should work to match those elements <two> that have children. Bye Francesco. On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:49:46 -0400, john-xsl-list <john-xsl-list@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > I want to process all second level nodes that have children. Is there an > XPath to retrieve all nodes having children, or do I add logic to ignore > nodes without children after the XPath has already been evaluated? > > <one> > <two> > <three> > </two> > <two /> > <two> > <three> > </two> > </one> > > Is there an XPath that will only return the first and third instances of > <two>? > > -- www.GetFirefox.com !!
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] XSL equivalent of SQL having, john-xsl-list | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSL equivalent of SQL hav, john-xsl-list |
[xsl] XSL equivalent of SQL having, john-xsl-list | Date | RE: [xsl] XSL equivalent of SQL hav, cknell |
Month |