Subject: Re: [xsl] xslt processors From: Dusan Zatkovsky <zatkovsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 13:43:11 +0200 |
On Friday 08 of October 2004 20:21, david_n_bertoni@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > By the way, I'm not sure how you can report that Xalan-C is 4-5 > times slower than xsltproc for the 17MB file when you killed the > process after 5 minutes! That doesn't make any sense at all. Can > you elaborate more? > That's the problem. On small documents, XalanC is slower than xsltproc. On big documents, I can't compare, because xsltproc initialization tooks much time. So in this case, XalanC speed calculated from total time is better, but not sufficient for me. -- Dusan Zatkovsky
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xslt processors, david_n_bertoni | Thread | Re: [xsl] xslt processors, Jeff Kenton |
Re: [xsl] xslt processors, Jeff Kenton | Date | Re: [xsl] xslt processors, Dusan Zatkovsky |
Month |