|
Subject: Re: [xsl] sorting and preceding-sibling - only print *first* in sorted list?? From: Kenneth Stephen <marvin.the.cynical.robot@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:09:42 -0500 |
Hi,
Why dont you write a second XSL program and have it operate on the
sorted output of the first? The document order for the
preceding-sibling in the second program will be the right order that
you need.
Regards,
Kenneth
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:55:29 -0400, Hardy Merrill
<hmerrill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I was trying to use "preceding-sibling" to figure out if the previous
> sibling ***in sorted order*** had the same district, but I've now
> figured out after reading on the subject that "preceding-sibling" does
> not operate on the sorted tree - instead it operates on the original
> tree that is in "document" order.
>
> I'd like to use the best/most efficient method to solve this problem -
> the muncheon technique using keys if possible. Can I do that, and if
> so, how?
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| [xsl] sorting and preceding-sibling, Hardy Merrill | Thread | Re: [xsl] sorting and preceding-sib, Hardy Merrill |
| [xsl] sorting and preceding-sibling, Hardy Merrill | Date | Re: [xsl] sorting and preceding-sib, Hardy Merrill |
| Month |