Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 *and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:47:20 +0100 |
> So better to have the stylesheets as 1.0, but individual templates as > 2.0? Not necessarily better, just different. You get different kinds of errors and/or maintenance problems in the two cases, which is best depends on various factors. Basically the underlying 2.0 model of un-nested ordered sequences poluted with XSD types is sufficiently different from that of 1.0 that there will always be behavioural differences between a 1.0 and 2.0 processor, even in backward compat mode. Given where they chose to start from I think they've made a pretty good job of compatibility, but still they could have started from somewhere else... I think I'd view the 1.0 compat features in 2.0 as a way of easing transition from one to the other not something that you'd really want to build on as a long term feature of the design of the stylesheets. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 *and* XSLT 1.0 v, Bruce D'Arcus | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 *and* XSLT 1.0 v, Dimtre Novatchev |
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 *and* XSLT 1.0 v, Bruce D'Arcus | Date | Re: [xsl] integrating xslt and xque, David Carlisle |
Month |