Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 *and* XSLT 1.0 validation -- how to? From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 07:43:39 +0100 |
> I wonder if there are XSLT 1.0 programmers, who find this mixed > language feature useful? Mixing 1.0 modules and 2.0 modules is definitely needed, so that one can include library code that hasn't been converted. I'm less convinced by finer-grained controls. If it hadn't already been there (on LREs) in 1.0, I doubt we would have added it. Michael Kay
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 *and* XSLT 1.0 v, Dimtre Novatchev | Thread | RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 *and* XSLT 1.0 v, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 *and* XSLT 1.0 v, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 *and* XSLT 1.0 v, Pawson, David |
Month |