Subject: RE: [xsl] non MS transform From: Pieter Reint Siegers Kort <pieter.siegers@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:37:37 -0600 |
Hi Jeffrey, IMO there's no such thing: ""standard" solution to transforming". Only personalized solutions exist. If you're happy with a solution and it works for your clients, then that's your personalized solution. :-) You will need to decide yourself if you need another approach; no one else can do that for you. Do you? Cheers, <prs/> -----Original Message----- From: Graber, Jeffrey [mailto:jeffrey.graber@xxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 10:27 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [xsl] non MS transform Howdy. I was happy as a clam with <html> <body> <script type="text/javascript"> // Load XML var xml = new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLDOM") xml.async = false xml.load("cdcatalog.xml") // Load XSL var xsl = new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLDOM") xsl.async = false xsl.load("cdcatalog.xsl") // Transform document.write(xml.transformNode(xsl)) </script> </body> </html> But then I was told that I had to come up with a non Microsoft approach. I thought that would be easy but my searching has not been successful. Could someone be so kind as to provide me with a "standard" solution to transforming. Thanks a million. Jeff Graber NG/IT/TASC 703 312 2289
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] non MS transform, M. David Peterson | Thread | [xsl] Cannot view XML input using X, karl |
Re: [xsl] nested output, Bruce D'Arcus | Date | Re: [xsl] Comparing nodes in axis, António Mota |
Month |