Subject: RE: [xsl] Relative XPATH between 2 nodes From: "Lyublinski, Leonid" <Leonid.Lyublinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:29:37 -0500 |
That's not necessary the case. Here is the example Node A: /A/B[2]/C[text()='test']/text() Node B: /A/B/D[@a='123']/comment() The short cut doesn't follow xxx::*[n] As far as I can see the most promising logic is in converting XPATH to XPOINTER path first, then trying to short cut 2 Xpointers. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- - CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure by law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from printing, storing, disseminating, distributing or copying this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Neither this information block, the typed name of the sender, nor anything else in this message is intended to constitute an electronic signature, unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in this message. Thank you, Antares Management Solutions. ============================================================================= =
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Relative XPATH between 2 , David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Relative XPATH between 2 , David Carlisle |
RE: [xsl] graph-traversal query, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] Relative XPATH between 2 , Michael Kay |
Month |