Subject: Re: [xsl] Relative XPATH between 2 nodes From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:10:34 GMT |
> It should be smart enough to find a short cut, using existing > XPATH syntax. If you are only needing it to work on the given document then I think in general for two element nodes, the shortest relative Xpath can always be expressed in the form xxx::*[n] where xxx is one of a ancestor self preceding following descendant and n is a positive integer so you only have to find the two nodes decide whether one is or is not an ancestor of the other and then use the appropriate xxx axis. Travel along that axis until you find teh second node, then you kjnow what number to use for n. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Relative XPATH between 2 , Lyublinski, Leonid | Thread | RE: [xsl] Relative XPATH between 2 , Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] namespace reference in xs, David Carlisle | Date | [xsl] Need advice - Render HTML for, Hardy Merrill |
Month |