Subject: Re: [xsl] Transformation of From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 11 Feb 2005 13:11:57 +0000 |
>>>>> "Dimitre" == Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> We can argue about it - it depends upon the parser - a parser >> that rejected such names would not be in-compliant. Dimitre> Can you quote any section of the XML Spec which Dimitre> prescribes that an xml parser must raise an error on a ---- No. Dimitre> If there isn't such a text, then a parser rejecting such Dimitre> names is not compliant with the spec. That does not follow. As long as it MAY raise an error, then it is compliant. And the word "reserved" does mean that it is not permitted. A simple example - if you park your car in the space marked "Reserved for the managing director" - how long do you think you will keep your job? -- Colin Paul Adams Preston Lancashire
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Transformation of, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | Re: [xsl] Transformation of, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Transformation of, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | Re: [xsl] Transformation of, David Carlisle |
Month |