Subject: Re: [xsl] aborting element creation From: António Mota <amsmota@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:49:00 +0000 |
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 03:22:44 -0800 (PST), David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It may look bizarre now, but the world didn't turn out quite as people > thought, evidence the number of times people are told on this list and > elsewhere that it is often better to run the transformations on the > server rather than on the client. Which is probably true but was exactly > the thing which XML was developed to avoid. > We're doing exactly the opposite, we have a tree menu kind of menu running on all our web applications that was being designed on the server and we are changing that so the processing be made on the client, so there is no need to server round trips each time a user clicks on a menu. And in general i have the idea that the "wave" is turning again to put more power on the clients, at least on these kind of dinamical content...
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] aborting element creation, Joris Gillis | Thread | Re: [xsl] aborting element creation, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Transformation of, Elliotte Harold | Date | Re: [xsl] Transformation of, Colin Paul Adams |
Month |