Subject: Re: [xsl] Understanding Identity Transformations From: Karl Stubsjoen <kstubs@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 08:11:24 -0700 |
>So which would you advise to solve the question? > > "@cat and not(@cat='BLUE')" > > or > "@cat!='BLUE'" I'd choose to use the first... as it reads easier. Basically stating: My results must have the attribute "cat" and the value of this attribute can not equal "BLUE". So in all that we've learned, the != is basically a shorthand version of this? As well, you can think of it like this: you have to satisfy the left in order to satisfy the right. (just making sure I understand) Karl
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Understanding Identity Tr, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Understanding Identity Tr, Joris Gillis |
Re: [xsl] RE : Still Testing!, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] summing, ok, Marcos Hercules dos |
Month |