Subject: Re: [xsl] Performance problem From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:47:03 GMT |
> I get the following loading time: when I was a lad, printing TeX documents took around 15 minutes per page, but we were happy.... > 1. How can I know what XSLT processor Im using and in which version? (I > guess Im using Microsoft). You can print the value of the xsl:vendor system-property (but the answer is you are using msxml3) > should I move to xslt2 ? how can I do it ? XSLT2 is still in draft stage, saxon8 is the most commonly used implementation (no client side browser implementations exist yet). Are you sure you want to open a 10Mb file in a browser, ever? Personally I wouldn't have thought the difference between 41 and 64 seconds was that great. If you were running this in some kind of high throughput serever setting they'd all be too slow (but you wouldn't be using a browser as your parser in that setting) if you are using it for an end user file display, if someone is prepared to wait 40 seconds without killing the process, they'll wait 60 seconds. I'd be very surprised if div is slow (although Michael is the one with implementation knowledge) format-number is inherently a much more complicated operation. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Performance problem, ficfic m | Thread | RE: [xsl] Performance problem, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] Performance problem, ficfic m | Date | RE: [xsl] Selecting a node based on, Kevin Rodgers |
Month |