Re: [xsl] OT (browser standards)

[Mukul Gandhi <mukul_gandhi@xxxxxxxxx>]

I was suggesting this sort of activity only.. This
page very well puts the need..
http://webstandards.org/about/

But this seems an unofficial body.. Its just like you
and me expressing our opinion!

In this site, there is a page
http://webstandards.org/act/bug/ , where we can report
bugs to browser vendors.. But that mail would go to
Microsoft, Mozilla or Opera.. Its just like, when I
get an error on IE, an error page pops up saying
"report this problem to Microsoft.." .

What we need is, that W3C starts such activity, and
sets a similar kind of site... After collecting
feedbacks fom users, W3C can submit the list to
vendors.. If they can ensure enforcement, it'll be
great! But thats not possible, I think, as W3C can
only recommend standards, but cannot enforce them..

Regards,
Mukul

--- Robert Koberg <rob@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Have you seen:
> 
> http://webstandards.org/
> 
> ?
> 
> best,
> -Rob
> 
> 
> Mukul Gandhi wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >   The new standard errort you are refering
> > (http://www.whatwg.org/) seems to aim to
> standardize
> > new widgets like RTF controls, menus and toolbars
> > etc..
> > 
> > Its a nice effort..
> > 
> > But we already have lot of standards like HTTP
> 1.1,
> > HTML 4, XML 1.0, XSLT 1.0, SSL 3.0 etc.. First,
> > implementation of these should be uniform acrosss
> > browsers.. 
> > 
> > I feel, many of the specs implemented are uniform
> > across major browsers(I would say 65%). Probably,
> W3C
> > should make a list of things which are not
> > uniform(studying themself, and by taking user
> > feedbacks) and submit that list to MS, Mozilla,
> Opera
> > to be implemented! MS can release patches for IE,
> as
> > it practices today. I am not sure, whether W3C
> charter
> > permits this activity.. Probably yes.. It will
> surely
> > benifit users..
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Mukul
> > 
> > --- David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >>  The "Web Browser Framework standard" could
> include
> >>  something like following list as minimum set of
> >>  features that should be same(including spec
> >>versions
> >>  like HTTP 1.1, XSLT 1.0 etc) across all browsers
> -
> >>
> >>the chance of getting xslt in a minimum  agreed
> set
> >>of features is
> >>I would say zero. Opera, Safari and my mobile
> phone
> >>don't do xslt and I
> >>don't see any sign of them doing so in the
> >>foreseeable future.
> >>
> >>If you want to see what one subset of browser
> >>implementors thinks is core
> >>browse around
> >>
> >>http://www.whatwg.org/
> >>
> >>David



	
		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail