RE: Re[2]: [xsl] Transformation using Saxon.Net-1.0-RC1

Subject: RE: Re[2]: [xsl] Transformation using Saxon.Net-1.0-RC1
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:15:49 +0100
I'd suggest using the saxon-help list.

Michael Kay 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: M. David Peterson [mailto:m.david.x2x2x@xxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: 01 April 2005 09:54
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Re[2]: [xsl] Transformation using Saxon.Net-1.0-RC1
> Hi Dr Kay,
> Is this the appropriate place to ask questions regarding this or
> should I ask them on the Saxon-Help list?
> On a side note I too was very excited to hear that Dimitre in turn was
> pleased with the performance and common functionality and now this
> excitement has tripled to hear that you are pleased by this.  Again,
> there are many others (including you) who deserve praise for this and
> I am simply pleased to be evan a small part of bringing this first
> release to the community, looking forward to much more to come.  There
> is so much more that can be done and I am completely convinced that by
> engaging the community far more will be accomplished than if this were
> to not take place.  And to give credit again where credit is due I
> believe that it was through the encouragement and focus that Dimitre
> gave to me and this project that has ultimately brought us to this
> point, ready to move forward with much excitement and anticipation.
> I will await your response as to where I should post these questions. 
> I wonder if even the Wiki would be a good place as it will keep the
> conversations in a central place that can be added to as time permits
> as well as by others who may decide to become involved in various
> ways.  Thoughts?
> On Apr 1, 2005 1:18 AM, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > What I'd be glad to have in the near future is the 
> ability to pass to
> > > the transformation extension objects, written in native 
> .NET languages
> > > like C#. AFAIK M.D.Peterson is working on this and I am 
> confident he
> > > will have good results soon.
> > 
> > The extension mechanisms in Saxon are now highly 
> configurable: you can plug
> > in "extension binders" that implement their own rules for binding to
> > external functions, either alongside or instead of the 
> default mechanism. So
> > it should be possible to do this in a very clean way.
> > 
> > I'm pleased to hear positive news about Saxon.NET from a 
> demanding user.
> > 
> > Michael Kay
> >
> > 
> > 
> -- 
> <M:D/>
> :: M. David Peterson ::
> XML & XML Transformations, C#, .NET, and Functional Languages 
> Specialist

Current Thread