Subject: RE: [xsl] [XSLT] xsl:message output encoding ? From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 23:32:39 +0100 |
> Then I would like to formally petition the working group to > specify that > the serialization of xsl:message should respect the xsl:output > declaration, just like the serialization of the result > document. How do > I go about that? If you read the status section of the spec, it tells you how to raise comments. I don't think that using the same format as the principal output makes very much sense - why should it be the same? However, I can see an argument for providing some control. Some people only ever use xsl:message for simple text messages, in which case escaping < and > doesn't make much sense; but if you use it to output chunks of XML, like <xsl:message>Value of $tree: <xsl:copy-of select="$tree"/></xsl:message> then using the XML output method makes much more sense. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] [XSLT] xsl:message output, Kevin Rodgers | Thread | RE: [xsl] [XSLT] xsl:message output, Kevin Rodgers |
Re: [xsl] sum function and math exp, Wendell Piez | Date | RE: [xsl] sum function and math exp, Aron Bock |
Month |