Subject: Re: [xsl] mixing it up: REST+XML Namespaces + XLST From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:13:57 +0100 |
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.example.org/apps/tables/user#schema" which once again can easily be inferred from XML namespace by concatanating fn:namespace-uri() and '#schema' Yes you can clearly have a personal convention to put schemas anywhere (although I'm not sure that all systems will support a schema document at a fragment identifier weill they? (perhaps they will, I use XSD rather rarely) What I meant was though that you asked what people would put at a namespace URI and I gave the examples of (a) rddl which is expressly for that purpose and (b) XSD which has looking up the namespace URI as a built-in hint in the spec to allow validators to find schema documents in the absence of schemaLocation attributes. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] mixing it up: REST+XML Na, James Fuller | Thread | Re: [xsl] mixing it up: REST+XML Na, Eric van der Vlist |
RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Jirka Kosek |
Month |