Subject: Re: [xsl] Total number of pages with XSL-FO From: Nadia.Swaby@xxxxxx Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 12:52:15 -0400 |
Hi All It worked like a charm. I feel kinda silly now. I don't know why neither me nor my predecessor thought of it before (I think it didn't occur to him because the first time he attempted this strategy, we were using FOP. But, there is no excuse for me!). Thanks to every one for their help and brilliant ideas! Nadia JBryant@xxxxxxxx m To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cc: 2005-04-21 12:21 Subject: Re: [xsl] Total number of pages with XSL-FO Please respond to xsl-list I must have confused your issue with some other issue. Sorry about that. If you can put keep-with previous on the empty ID block, that should keep that blank page from popping up. Jay Bryant Bryant Communication Services (presently consulting at Synergistic Solution Technologies) Nadia.Swaby@xxxxxx 04/21/2005 11:13 AM Please respond to xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cc Subject Re: [xsl] Total number of pages with XSL-FO Actually, I am using Antenna house, it does support keep-with-previous , and I just thought about that 5 mins ago. I will try after lunch. Nadia Swaby JBryant@xxxxxxxx m To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cc: 2005-04-21 12:03 Subject: Re: [xsl] Total number of pages with XSL-FO Please respond to xsl-list That'd be great, Jirka, but Nadia is using FOP (if I recall correctly), and the current version of FOP only supports keeps on tables. Jay Bryant Bryant Communication Services (presently consulting at Synergistic Solution Technologies) Jirka Kosek <jirka@xxxxxxxx> 04/21/2005 10:59 AM Please respond to xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cc Subject Re: [xsl] Total number of pages with XSL-FO JBryant@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >>From a few messages ago: > -------------------------------------------------------- > If you want to be absolutely sure that content appears on the last page, > put the last block that has content and the empty block into a table that > has two rows (one for each block). Then set keep-with-next="always" on the > first row. That way, the empty block can never be on a page by itself. > -------------------------------------------------------- Wouldn't it be easier to do just: <fo:block id="last-page" line-height="0" keep-with-previous="always"/> There will not be need to surround last block in document with the table. (I'm assuming that FO processor supports keep-with-next, which is not case for FOP.) -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@xxxxxxxx http://www.kosek.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------ Profesionalnm 9kolenm a poradenstvm v oblasti technologim XML. Podmvejte se na na9 novl spu9tln} web http://DocBook.cz Podrobn} pxehled 9kolenm http://xmlguru.cz/skoleni/ ------------------------------------------------------------------
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Total number of pages wit, JBryant | Thread | [xsl] XSLT processor and substring-, N Zhou |
Re: [xsl] Total number of pages wit, JBryant | Date | [xsl] Java Transformation, Ramkumar Menon |
Month |