Subject: [xsl] Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re: [xsl] Time for an exslt for 2.0?) From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 06:42:23 +1000 |
Maybe it's still not too-late for @memo-function and environment variables in system-property() to be included in the standard XSLT 2.0 ? This would be one of the last good deeds of the respected members of the XSLT 2.0 WG that would be highly appreciated by the XSLT community. Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev On 12 May 2005 12:03:49 +0100, Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > EXSLT seems to be dead. Both Dimitre and I have fairly recently > submitted proposals for new features (memo-functions, and environment > variables for system-property() (as suggested by Michael Kay) > respectively. > Both were agreed, yet nothing has appeared on the web site (despite > Dmitre chasing up on his proposal). > Maybe it's time for an equivalent for XSLT 2.0? > -- > Colin Adams > Preston Lancashire
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Time for an exslt for 2.0, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | RE: [xsl] Better include them in th, Michael Kay |
[xsl] Linear sequence of moves to r, Stuart Yeates | Date | RE: [xsl] Better include them in th, Michael Kay |
Month |