Subject: Re: [xsl] Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re: [xsl] Time for an exslt for 2.0?) From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 13 May 2005 05:36:24 +0100 |
>>>>> "Dimitre" == Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> writes: Dimitre> Or be prepared for all kinds of a nasty surprise Dimitre> following the fact that the value of Dimitre> my:f($x) is my:f($x) Dimitre> is generally not guaranteed to be true() It isn't, as if either function returns an atomic sequence, you get a type error. -- Colin Adams Preston Lancashire
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Better include them in th, Kevin Rodgers | Thread | Re: [xsl] Better include them in th, Dimitre Novatchev |
Re: [xsl] Linear sequence of moves , Colin Paul Adams | Date | Re: [xsl] Refactoring parsing code , Micah Dubinko |
Month |