|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re: [xsl] Time for an exslt for 2.0?) From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 17:40:59 +1000 |
> To be pedantic, my:f($x) is my:f($x) should always evaluate to true()
> in the absence of errors. But that can be taken as read.
This is the problem it shouldn't, according to the XSLT 2.0 spec:
there are cases when
my:f($x) is my:f($x)
evaluates to false().
This happens when my:f() is defined in such a way that it creates new
node(s) on every evaluation.
Cheers,
Dimitre.
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Better include them in th, Colin Paul Adams | Thread | Re: [xsl] Better include them in th, Colin Paul Adams |
| Re: [xsl] Better include them in th, Colin Paul Adams | Date | RE: [xsl] Refactoring parsing code , Michael Kay |
| Month |