Subject: Re: [xsl] Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re: [xsl] Time for an exslt for 2.0?) From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 17:40:59 +1000 |
> To be pedantic, my:f($x) is my:f($x) should always evaluate to true() > in the absence of errors. But that can be taken as read. This is the problem it shouldn't, according to the XSLT 2.0 spec: there are cases when my:f($x) is my:f($x) evaluates to false(). This happens when my:f() is defined in such a way that it creates new node(s) on every evaluation. Cheers, Dimitre.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Better include them in th, Colin Paul Adams | Thread | Re: [xsl] Better include them in th, Colin Paul Adams |
Re: [xsl] Better include them in th, Colin Paul Adams | Date | RE: [xsl] Refactoring parsing code , Michael Kay |
Month |