Subject: Re: [xsl] relative path from one node to another (XSLT 2.0 solution) From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 17:49:07 +0100 |
> I never knew there were > intersect and except operators! Wrong tense. The current version of XPath does not have either of those operators, but you asked for XSLT2 in the subject line and that comes with XPath2. Which isn't yet finished so you are talking about what will be in XSLT2 and Xpath2 in the future. So you are working on the bleeding edge. No one is familiar with this stuff, by definition. (Some of us think we are familiar with it and get caught out that it changed from one draft to the next.) > I get on with C all right Don't you get confused, variables changing their values all over the place?? > Does anyone else feel like this?.....) Not on this list. (We have them forcibly ejected:-) David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] relative path from one no, Richard Lewis | Thread | Re: [xsl] relative path from one no, Richard Lewis |
Re: [xsl] numbering/count(), Bruce D'Arcus | Date | Re: [xsl] numbering/count(), David Carlisle |
Month |