Subject: Re: [xsl] relative path from one node to another (XSLT 2.0 solution) From: "Richard Lewis" <richardlewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 17:58:41 +0100 |
On Fri, 20 May 2005 17:49:07 +0100, "David Carlisle" <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> said: > > > I get on with C all right > > Don't you get confused, variables changing their values all over the > place?? > Surely thats what *variable* means ;-) > > > Does anyone else feel like this?.....) > > Not on this list. (We have them forcibly ejected:-) > Uh oh. I'd better pretend I was joking; that sounds painful!
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] relative path from one no, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] relative path from one no, Colin Paul Adams |
Re: [xsl] numbering/count(), David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] relative path from one no, Ross, Douglas |
Month |