Re: [xsl] disable-output-escaping for attributes

[Victor <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxx>]

David Carlisle wrote:

> > Maybe I didn't get whole picture about character maps but they seem 
> > overly complicated in contrast to "just" use DOE (expecially because 
> > input and output will look very different)
> >    
>
> character maps are more flexible but the simple case of emulating d-o-e
> doesn't really involve much extra syntax over the d-o-e method.
> See for-example the posting:
> http://www.biglist.com/lists/xsl-list/archives/200503/msg00585.html
> I suggest in a followup that this be wrapped in an xsl:function
>
>  
Thanks for the article. This surely makes things easier. But it seems 
that a character map based solution cannot be maintenance free.
The maps (and translate function) have to be created in advance but I 
cannot know whith what stange characters the user of the templates may 
come up.
With a d-o-e solution I don't have to care, character maps may have be 
adapted if the content changes.

Victor