Subject: RE: [xsl] 1.0 and 2.0 and suitability for tasks From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 19:50:20 +0100 |
> So I would like to hear how one version or the other might benefit either > effort. The only possible benefit in using XSLT 1.0 is maturity: there are more processors available and the language specification is more stable. Set against that, the productivity benefits of 2.0 are very substantial, and apply across a broad range of applications. Assessment of risk in moving to a new technology is something that each organisation has to do for itself. I personally find it difficult to understand why some organisations are much more prepared to take these risks than others - it seems to have very little to do with any objective assessment, more on subjective attitudes. There are a lot of organisations using Saxon 8.x successfully for applications that are definitely mission-critical; at the same time I can't fault someone who advises against it on grounds of caution. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] 1.0 and 2.0 and suitabili, Frans Englich | Thread | RE: [xsl] 1.0 and 2.0 and suitabili, Wendell Piez |
RE: [xsl] How to get UTC displayed , Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] 1.0 and 2.0 and suitabili, Wendell Piez |
Month |