<-prev [Thread] next-> <-prev [Date] next->
Month Index | List Home

Re: [xsl] 1.0 and 2.0 and suitability for tasks

Subject: Re: [xsl] 1.0 and 2.0 and suitability for tasks
From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 17:35:00 -0400
At 04:43 PM 8/24/2005, Dimitre wrote:
> So I think the best thing we XSLTers can do for now is try 2.0 and assess
> it on our own, not paying too too much attention to the marketers either way.

...

Tried.

Assessed.

Remarkable results produced...

Just try to compare FXSL for XSLT 2.0 with FXSL for XSLT 1.0.

Yes: for FXSL it is an obvious gain. So that's one scenario for which we have some kind of authoritative finding. :->

Cheers,
Wendell


======================================================================
Wendell Piez                            mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mulberry Technologies, Inc.                http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street                    Direct Phone: 301/315-9635
Suite 207                                          Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD  20850                                 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML
======================================================================

Current Thread
<- PreviousIndexNext ->
Re: [xsl] 1.0 and 2.0 and suitabili, Dimitre Novatchev Thread Re: [xsl] 1.0 and 2.0 and suitabili, Manfred Staudinger
Re: [xsl] How to get UTC displayed , Wendell Piez Date Re: [xsl] 1.0 and 2.0 and suitabili, Manfred Staudinger
Month