Subject: Re: [xsl] 1.0 and 2.0 and suitability for tasks From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 08:04:45 +1000 |
Access to an XSLT 2.0 processor through scripting doesn't seem that difficult to implement without any browser developer involvement. Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev. On 8/25/05, Manfred Staudinger <manfred.staudinger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I would like to use XSLT 2.0 only. But as the client side > processing depends on browser support, I have to split > my application and keep the stylesheets for the browser > at XSLT 1.0. > Or is support for XSLT 2.0 coming soon in any browser? > > Regards, Manfred > > On 8/24/05, Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > So I think the best thing we XSLTers can do for now is try 2.0 and assess > > > it on our own, not paying too too much attention to the marketers either way. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Wendell > > > > > > Tried. > > > > Assessed. > > > > Remarkable results produced... > > > > Just try to compare FXSL for XSLT 2.0 with FXSL for XSLT 1.0. > > > > > > Cheers, > > Dimitre Novatchev > > -- Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev --------------------------------------- Harry did not ask how Dumbledore knew; ...but Harry had long since learned that bangs and smoke were more often the marks of ineptitude than expertise.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] 1.0 and 2.0 and suitabili, António Mota | Thread | [xsl] Text Sort Problem, KrustyDerClown |
Re: [xsl] How to get UTC displayed , JBryant | Date | [xsl] Text Sort Problem, KrustyDerClown |
Month |