|
Subject: Re: [xsl] concat all items in a sequence From: andrew welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:53:16 +0100 |
On 8/30/05, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I'm using the following:
> >
> > contains(elem, val)
> >
> > It's possible that 'elem' can be a sequence of more than one item.
> >
> > The way I've code around this is to use string-join with an empty
> > string as one of the arguments:
> >
> > contains(string-join(for $i in elem return $i, ''), val)
> >
> > Is there a better way?
>
> 1. The expression
>
> for $i in elem return $i
>
> can be rewritten as
>
> elem
>
> So you get
>
> contains(string-join(elem, ''), val)
>
> 2. Do you want to match substrings that cross item boundaries, e.g. do you
> want contains(('red', 'green'), 'edgr') to be true? If so, I don't think
you
> can do better than the above. If you don't want this, then apply contains
to
> each string in the sequence separately:
>
> exists(elem[contains(., val)])
It's the latter, thanks, lots to go on there.
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] concat all items in a seq, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] concat all items in a seq, Dimitre Novatchev |
| RE: [xsl] Using a variable as part , Khorasani, Houman | Date | RE: [xsl] Problem passing Paramete, Mho Salim |
| Month |