RE: [xsl] Opinions, please. Keep entire archive or toss old?

[B Tommie Usdin <btusdin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 10:01 PM +0100 10/12/05, Michael Kay wrote:
> Firstly, it doesn't make all that much difference since there are copies
> elsewhere on the web:
>
> http://www.stylusstudio.com/xsllist/
>
> But keep it. History is good.
>
> My first post is pretty embarrassing with hindsight, but it was early days:
>
> http://www.stylusstudio.com/xsllist/199802/post60020.html
>
> After all, Paul Grosso was telling us that they didn't want to have to make
> XSL namespace-aware:
>
> http://www.stylusstudio.com/xsllist/199802/post10020.html

The fact that you point to one of the unofficial archives really says
it all; I COULDN'T edit the record if I wanted to. Since the question
is moot, and since everyone who has responded agrees that we should
keep the whole archive, that's what we'll do.

-- Tommie
--
======================================================================
B. Tommie Usdin                        mailto:btusdin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mulberry Technologies, Inc.                http://www.mulberrytech.com   
17 West Jefferson Street                           Phone: 301/315-9631
Suite 207                                    Direct Line: 301/315-9634
Rockville, MD  20850                                 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in XML and SGML
======================================================================