Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT in UML From: bryan rasmussen <rasmussen.bryan@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:53:12 +0100 |
Hmm, Has anyone thought about interleaving XMI and XSLT? On 11/29/05, Insane User <com.intel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Manuel, > > Have you considered the use of "Activity Diagrams"? > > Activity Diagrams are as close to flow charting, or process control in UML as one can get. > > Regards, > topdog > > >From: Manuel Baehnisch <s716631@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Date: Mon Nov 28 16:52:33 CST 2005 > >To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >Subject: [xsl] XSLT in UML > > >Are there any current efforts or already drafts on the issue of > >describing XSLT-templates in a UML-like language? For my thesis I > >would like to explain some of the more complex templates using > >diagrams. But as it seems there is nothing like UML for the > >declarative paradigm, is it? > > > >My inital thought was to use something like a flow-chart as it is used > >in procedural languages. Knowing that the diagrams would suggest a > >linear execution even though its unknown in which order the > >processor calls the templates it seemed like the best approach to me. > > > >Any better ideas? Otherwise I would have to "invent" something myself. > >Manuel Baehnisch
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT in UML, Insane User | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT in UML, James Fuller |
RE: [xsl] Finding and promoting foo, Jarno.Elovirta | Date | Re: [xsl] passing parameters betwee, James Fuller |
Month |