Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT in UML From: Insane User <com.intel@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 13:08:55 -0600 (CST) |
Hi Manuel, Have you considered the use of "Activity Diagrams"? Activity Diagrams are as close to flow charting, or process control in UML as one can get. Regards, topdog >From: Manuel Baehnisch <s716631@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Date: Mon Nov 28 16:52:33 CST 2005 >To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: [xsl] XSLT in UML >Are there any current efforts or already drafts on the issue of >describing XSLT-templates in a UML-like language? For my thesis I >would like to explain some of the more complex templates using >diagrams. But as it seems there is nothing like UML for the >declarative paradigm, is it? > >My inital thought was to use something like a flow-chart as it is used >in procedural languages. Knowing that the diagrams would suggest a >linear execution even though its unknown in which order the >processor calls the templates it seemed like the best approach to me. > >Any better ideas? Otherwise I would have to "invent" something myself. >Manuel Baehnisch
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XSLT in UML, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT in UML, bryan rasmussen |
RE: [xsl] IDREFS and key(), Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] namespaces and xmlns="", Michael Kay |
Month |