Re: [xsl] Fwd: Five xdt:* types renamed

Subject: Re: [xsl] Fwd: Five xdt:* types renamed
From: "Joe Fawcett" <joefawcett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 08:22:07 +0000
I don't know, but I can already see a slew of future posts to which the reply will be:

Well originally these types were in the ... namespace but were moved rather late in the game, you'll have to modify your ...

An FAQ in the making.



From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [xsl] Fwd: Five xdt:* types renamed
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 09:02:36 +0100

What does this mean for XML Schema?

Bryan Rasmussen

On 2/23/06, Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Wow !!!
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Liam Quin <liam@xxxxxx>
> Date: Feb 23, 2006 3:55 PM
> Subject: Five xdt:* types renamed
> To: www-ql@xxxxxx
> It's relatively unusual to make substantive changes in specifications
> this late in the W3C Process, but everyone involved felt it was an
> improvement:
> The types xdt:anyAtomicType, xdt:yearMonthDuration, xdt:dayTimeDuration,
> xdt:untyped, and xdt:untypedAtomic will all be moved into the
> W3C XML Schema namespace (with the kind permission of the W3C XML
> Schema Working Group) and will therefore become xs:anyAtomicType,
> xs:yearMonthDuration, xs:dayTimeDuration xs:untyped, and xs:untypedAtomic.
> Liam
> (W3C Staff Contact and Participant in the XML Query Working Group)
> --
> Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead,
> Texts and Pictures from old books:
> Liam ("Ankh") on the Web:
> --
> Cheers,
> Dimitre Novatchev
> ---------------------------------------
> The significant problems we have cannot be solved at the same level of
> thinking with which we created them.

Current Thread