Re: [xsl] is arity-based "polymorphism" safe to use in xsl 2.0 functions?

Subject: Re: [xsl] is arity-based "polymorphism" safe to use in xsl 2.0 functions?
From: Joern Nettingsmeier <nettings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:47:37 +0100
Michael Kay wrote:
The spec allows you to write this because the designers thought it was
useful, so go ahead and use it.

But I prefer the version at

http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-functions/#index-of-node

whew. two thirds shorter than mine. how depressing. :-D thanks for this very instructive pointer. must've overlooked it.

btw, thanks to all the XSL gurus around here, i've learned so much during the few days that i've been reading this list!

kind regards,

jvrn


-- jvrn nettingsmeier

home://germany/45128 essen/lortzingstr. 11/
http://spunk.dnsalias.org
phone://+49/201/491621

if you are a free (as in "free speech") software developer
and you happen to be travelling near my home, drop me a line
and come round for a free (as in "free beer") beer. :-D

Current Thread