RE: [xsl] upgrading to XSLT 2 was: string token removal

Subject: RE: [xsl] upgrading to XSLT 2 was: string token removal
From: Webmaster <Webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:53:57 -0500
nope. I don't have saxon in any stylesheet element or attribute, But I did
have a reference to the saxon653.jar file in my classpath because I'm
extending docbook for internal uses. I removed that from my classpath.. So
after I got rid of the "1.0" errors, I now move this topic to docbook,
because it seems that docbook doesn't like saxon 8.

Thanks very much Michael!

LN

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Kay [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 12:04 PM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [xsl] upgrading to XSLT 2 was: string token removal
> 
> 
> You've probably got an extension-element-prefixes attribute in your
> stylesheet, bound to the old Saxon namespace. The chances are 
> this attribute
> is quite unnecessary - people often put it in thinking that 
> it's needed when
> calling extension functions.
> 
> You can ignore the warning about running a 1.0 stylesheet with a 2.0
> processor; but I would advise changing the version attribute 
> to 2.0 to get
> the benefits of XSLT 2.0 type checking. It's possible this 
> might throw up
> one or two errors, however - for example 
> 
> start-with(-12.3, "-")
> 
> is allowed under version="1.0" but is a type error under 
> version="2.0".
> 
> Michael Kay
> http://www.saxonica.com/ 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Webmaster [mailto:Webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
> > Sent: 09 August 2006 22:32
> > To: 'xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> > Subject: RE: [xsl] upgrading to XSLT 2 was: string token removal
> > 
> > Thank you for your quick response! Got a little further:  
> > Now, I'm getting a warning that I'm running a 1.0 stylesheet 
> > with a 2.0 processor, which I would think would be ok, but it 
> > then errors out on:
> > 
> > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> > /com/icl/saxon/style/ExtensionElementFactory
> > 
> > Any thoughts on this?
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Michael Kay [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 3:35 PM
> > > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: RE: [xsl] upgrading to XSLT 2 was: string token removal
> > > 
> > > 
> > > The entry point for Saxon8 changed from 
> com.icl.saxon.StyleSheet to 
> > > net.sf.saxon.Transform.
> > > 
> > > Michael Kay
> > > http://www.saxonica.com/
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Webmaster [mailto:Webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > > Sent: 09 August 2006 21:04
> > > > To: 'xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> > > > Subject: RE: [xsl] upgrading to XSLT 2 was: string token removal
> > > > 
> > > > Hi. I was using saxon 6.5.3, which I undstand to be XSLT 
> > 1.0, so I 
> > > > installed saxon8, and updated my classpath to the new 
> saxon8.jar..
> > > > 
> > > > I'm getting the error:
> > > > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> > > > com/icl/saxon/StyleSheet
> > > > 
> > > > Is there anyone out there that could help me on this? I tried 
> > > > looking on the web without much success.
> > > > 
> > > > Is there a specific version of Java I need? I have 1.4.0_8
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks for your quick response and  help David!
> > > > 
> > > > LN
> > > > 
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@xxxxxxxxx]
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 10:55 AM
> > > > > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > Subject: Re: [xsl] string token removal
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Assuming that "year" is any string of space, four digits,
> > > comma and
> > > > > you want to replace them by a comma then in xslt2 you can go 
> > > > > <xsl:value-of select="replace(.,'
> > > [0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9],',',')"/> in
> > > > > xslt1 you'd have to try a lot harder unless you have 
> > acces sto an 
> > > > > extension function with regular expression support, which
> > > some xslt
> > > > > systems do have.
> > > > > 
> > > > > David

Current Thread