Re: [xsl] xinclude in xslt2

[Erik Wilde <net.dret@xxxxxxxx>]

hello.

i would be happy with a minimal conforming implementation in xslt 2.0, 
meaning that only the element() scheme of xpointer would have to be 
supported. i would doubt that supporting the xpointer() scheme is 
something anybody would like to do, in particular since even xslt 2 does 
not support the evaluation of dynamically generated xpaths (one of the 
things i would have loved to see in xslt 2).

apart from that, i cannot imagine what the hard parts should be, but 
maybe i am a bit to naive. anyway, i would be very happy to be pointed 
to a list of potential problems before i get started.

thanks and cheers,

erik wilde     tel:+1-510-6421464 - fax:+1-510-6425814
     dret@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx - http://dret.net/netdret/
     School of Information - UC Berkeley (ISchool/UCB)