|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Standards checkers for XSLT From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 25 Nov 2006 15:54:21 +0000 |
>>>>> "Dimitre" == Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> Space and keystorkes do not need economy.
Dimitre> This is not completely true.
Well, no - not taken to extremes.
>> Code is far more often read than written, so it is a false
>> economy to worry about the number of keystrokes.
Dimitre> Whenever there are 3-4 names and each of them is twice
Dimitre> longer than it could be (just for "readability") very
We weren't talking about twice as long - just one extra character per
word.
Dimitre> easy to end up with so long lines that one would need to
Dimitre> scroll horizontally to read the whole text.
Dimitre> This is a case, when putting too much effort for
Dimitre> readability achieves the reverse effect.
Well, yes. But I didn't see anyone arguing for such a practice.
Dimitre> Also, here we are talking about "cosmetics", which is so
Dimitre> much trivial and superficial compared to "real health" of
Dimitre> a system. :o)
No, it isn't trivial at all. It's a vital part of maintaining the
"real health" of a system.
A clear legible and consitent style is a huge benefit in that respect.
--
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Standards checkers for XS, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | Re: [xsl] Standards checkers for XS, Dimitre Novatchev |
| Re: [xsl] Standards checkers for XS, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | Re: [xsl] Transform inline-block ty, Christian Roth |
| Month |