Subject: Re: [xsl] Standards checkers for XSLT From: Kamal Bhatt <kbhatt@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 08:44:24 +1100 |
At 10:32 AM -0800 11/25/06, Dimitre Novatchev wrote:Yes, that was my initial intention.As much as this may be interesting and useful we both know that there are much more important things we can be dealing with...
Let's stop this thread now.
If you are not interested in continuing to participate in the discussion you are welcome to refrain. However, suggesting (especially to one of the several people involved in a discussion) that the thread be stopped seems ... well ... odd.
The original poster asked a reasonable question and there have been several reasoned responses. While debates on the best convention for forming names seem a little silly to me the larger question of how to write XSLT for long term maintainability (which is what I assume the OP had in mind when asking about standards for XSLT) is an important and interesting topic for discussion.
<Ford>...</Ford> <Holden>...</Holden> <Toyota>...</Toyota>
<Manufacturers> <Ford>...</Ford> <Holden>...</Holden> <Toyota>...</Toyota> </Manufacturers>
-- Kamal Bhatt
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Standards checkers for XS, Mulberry Technologie | Thread | Re: [xsl] Standards checkers for XS, Joe Fawcett |
[xsl] What should the document-uri(, Colin Paul Adams | Date | Re: [xsl] Standards checkers for XS, Rashmi Rubdi |
Month |