Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 has arrived From: Nic James Ferrier <nferrier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:15:40 +0000 |
Abel Braaksma <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Reading this, I really haven't the faintest idea why there are still > people around there using xsltproc. Working around bugs and > non-compliance issues. Or, well, maybe that's it: like the experience I > had with XML Spy. Using it, you think "this is the way to do it". Using > your wrong non compliant stylesheets with a compliant processor will > give you errors, and you go "ah, you see? XML Spy is better! It does not > give me errors". Whereas you should say: "oops, I thought I coded > correctly, but instead, I did not. Now I can finally fix my erroneous > stylesheets". I use libxslt because it's fast. I don't think libxslt is fundamentally broken. And I'm hoping to help bring it to xslt 2 over the next few years. -- Nic Ferrier http://www.tapsellferrier.co.uk for all your tapsell ferrier needs
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 has arrived, Colin Adams | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 has arrived, Elliotte Harold |
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 has arrived, Colin Adams | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 has arrived, Andrew Welch |
Month |