Subject: Re: [xsl] Microsoft XML Team blog: XSLT 2.0 From: "M. David Peterson" <m.david@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 04:01:02 -0700 |
It seems that no-one has drawn the attention of the list to
No, not on the list, but most certainly elsewhere > http://www.oreillynet.com/xml/blog/2007/01/i_heart_xml_team.html
Setting aside the obvious "fun with words" of the above linked post, since it seems that there are those willing to ignore how much effort went into bringing this event into fruition, let me please direct you to the chain of events that led to this announcement,
http://blogs.msdn.com/mfussell/archive/2004/05/13/130969.aspx#131159 http://blogs.msdn.com/mfussell/archive/2004/05/13/130969.aspx#163580 http://www.xsltblog.com/archives/2005/03/saxonnet_10_rc1.html http://www.xsltblog.com/archives/2005/05/first_real_saxo.html http://www.xsltblog.com/archives/2006/02/saxonsaxonnet_v.html
I think Mike Champion said it best, [http://blogs.msdn.com/xmlteam/archive/2007/01/29/xslt-2-0.aspx#1561267]
"And we worried that M. David would hate us because XSLT2 wouldn't ship in Orcas :=)"
When you consider that 3 years ago, XSLT 2.0 at MSFT was dead, and XQuery was king, to now realize that the exact opposite is the case...
Well, a lot of people deserve credit for helping to make all of this happen. I'll let you fill in the blanks as to who those people are from here...
-- /M:D
M. David Peterson http://mdavid.name | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Microsoft XML Team blog: XSLT, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] Microsoft XML Team blog: , Michael Kay |
[xsl] = vs. eq / was: Re: [xsl] Get, Yves Forkl | Date | RE: [xsl] Microsoft XML Team blog: , Michael Kay |
Month |