Subject: RE: [xsl] Saxon Transformation From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 09:19:39 -0000 |
> Which of the below method is best to use, Comparing its speed > of processing, effectiveness etc., > > java net.sf.saxon.Transform -o MyFile.html MyFile.xml MyFile.xsl > > java -jar saxon.jar MyFile.xml MyFile.xsl > MyFile.htm As far as Saxon is concerned, they are identical. One may give slighly faster Java loading than the other, but in a transformation of any size the difference will be irrelevant. If you're at all concerned about the performance of the transformation, you shouldn't be using the command line at all, you should be using the Java API, or some other mechanism (e.g. Kernow, Ant) that keeps the Java VM loaded. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Xsl:copy-of writes xmlns:, Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] sorting like in order by clau, Markus Gamperl |
[xsl] Xsl:copy-of writes xmlns:xsi , binu.idicula | Date | RE: [xsl] Xsl:copy-of writes xmlns:, Michael Kay |
Month |