Subject: Re: [xsl] Hidden implementation-defined behaviour From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 09:58:04 +0100 |
> Anyway, I do not think such behaviour can be guarenteed, since it depends > upon what the URI resolution process does. yes that's always the case, as you know it's perfectly OK to return <foo>hello</foo> for every call on document() as well, just using a (strange but conformant) URI entity resolver. As I said in my original comment to the comment list I thought the behaviour would have been better if it had mandated normalization, but sometimes you don't get what you ask for:-) David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Hidden implementation-def, Colin Adams | Thread | Re: [xsl] Hidden implementation-def, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Hidden implementation-def, David Carlisle | Date | [xsl] xslt 1.1 - one liner, Hasnain Panjwani |
Month |