RE: [xsl] Grammars for XPath 2.0: which to use?

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

RE: [xsl] Grammars for XPath 2.0: which to use?

Subject: RE: [xsl] Grammars for XPath 2.0: which to use?
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:05:41 +0100

> so these compound symbols appear as <cast as>

In the mail I sent, those angle brackets were chevrons. Sad that we're still
using software which only supports 7-bit characters in this day and age.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

Current Thread
[xsl] Grammars for XPath 2.0: which to use? Dimitre Novatchev - Thu, 12 Jul 2007 21:12:08 -0700 Michael Kay - Fri, 13 Jul 2007 09:46:16 +0100 Michael Kay - Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:05:41 +0100 <= Dimitre Novatchev - Fri, 13 Jul 2007 06:40:20 -0700

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] Grammars for XPath 2.0: w, Michael Kay	Thread	Re: [xsl] Grammars for XPath 2.0: w, Dimitre Novatchev
Re: [xsl] Clientside XSLT Transform, David Carlisle	Date	[xsl] > replaced by ">", < is, Jethro Borsje
	Month