Subject: [xsl] XSLT 2.0: Schema-aware processor: What are the compelling advantages over a non-SA processor? From: Justin Johansson <procode@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:29:42 +0900 |
Hello again, Per my previous post, I've made a significant personal investment in learning XSLT 2.0. I use Michael Kay's Saxon 8b (non-SA) processor and think it absolutely rocks. To continue on my journey of XSLT enlightenment, I'd like to know what the compelling reasons are to use an XSLT 2.0 schema-aware processor. Is Dr. Kay's/Saxonica'a the only one out there? Probably I'll purchase a copy anyway, even if for no other reason other than to show my appreciation for his excellent work and kind open sourcing of Saxon non-SA. Unfortunately the last few XSLT contracts I've had have been on MSXML/XSLT 1.0 shops so I haven't had the benefit of employer support for XSLT 2.0 let alone a schema-aware processor. Thanks in advance for feedback, Justin Johansson Freelance XML / XSLT / XQuery Developer Australia procode(at)tpg(dot)com(dot)au
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.0 & XSLT 2.0: Mark, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0: Schema-aware pr, Abel Braaksma |
[xsl] XSLT 1.0 & XSLT 2.0: Market s, Justin Johansson | Date | RE: [xsl] XSLT 1.0 & XSLT 2.0: Mark, Colin Adams |
Month |