Subject: Re: [xsl] [xslt 2.0] Local functions From: Justin Johansson <procode@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 12:34:36 +0900 |
I forgot to include: So now it doesn't matter what the syntax of my ultimate higher level XSLT looks like; it's now just a matter of making the difficult choices in specifying what this language should look like and figuring out what escaping mechanism to use to switch syntax modes (if any). Current candidates include: 4. OO-like. Have document nodes and elements, or maybe nodes in general, behave like objects and bind code to them in "class definitions". Encapsulate in this way and re-introduce the idea of a hidden "this" pointer as in C++ or Java. Compelling reason for this is to leverage UML modelling tools in designing XSLT programs. Cheers Justin Johansson Freelance XML / XSLT / XQuery Developer Australia procode(at)tpg(dot)com(dot)au
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] [xslt 2.0] Local function, Justin Johansson | Thread | [xsl] [xslt 2.0] Difference betwen , Justin Johansson |
Re: [xsl] [xslt 2.0] Local function, Justin Johansson | Date | Re: [xsl] search for aligned elemen, Rodrigo Segnini |
Month |