Subject: RE: [xsl] [xslt 2.0] Local functions From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 08:59:40 +0100 |
> To that end, I'm working on a translator from a language with > a higher level syntax (ie. either reduced XML or no XML at > all) into XSLT 2.0. Before inventing your own, take a look at Ed Willink's NiceXSL at http://nicexsl.sourceforge.net/ An earlier attempt was Paul Tchistopolskii's XSLScript, which was at http://www.pault.com/XSLScript/pault/prod/XSLScript but that seems to be off the air. Apart from technical details of the syntax chosen, the more interesting question to ask is: why didn't these attempts catch on, and what's going to be different about yours? I think the main factor that inhibits take-up of such tools is that you can't really get by without learning the underlying language - you need this knowledge firstly to communicate with others about the language (e.g to read books and participate in forums), and secondly to understand error messages. So you're asking people to learn two languages instead of one. That's a high entry cost for the sake of saving a few keystrokes. (And with XSLT 2.0, the saving in keystrokes is a lot less because the worst verbosities, like the 5-line function call, have disappeared.) > > It occurs to me that it is possible to simulate local > functions in XSLT 2.0 (which effectively could be declared > inside xsl:template and xsl:function elements and the local > function elements themselves). > > Now, given that it can be done, question is :- > > Would it be desirable if XSLT 2.0 were to support local functions? There's any number of things that could be done, for example declaring functions as private or public, prohibiting override except by something with a compatible signature, etc etc. But if you want something to catch on in the community without it being in the W3C language spec, you need (a) a very compelling benefit, and (b) strong compatibility so people can use the feature without getting locked in. But don't let me discourage you from experimenting. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] [xslt 2.0] Local function, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] [xslt 2.0] Local function, Justin Johansson |
Re: [xsl] javascript result in xsl , Ronan Klyne | Date | RE: [xsl] [xslt 2.0] Difference bet, Michael Kay |
Month |